As car accident lawyers in Indianapolis, we have helped many clients navigate the aftermath of a crash where liability is not clear-cut. One of the most common questions we hear is, “Can both drivers be at fault in a car accident?” The answer is yes.
Indiana follows a comparative fault system, meaning more than one driver can bear legal responsibility for a collision. In these cases, how fault is divided can significantly affect the outcome of an insurance claim or lawsuit.
Here, we will explain how shared fault works under Indiana law, how fault is determined, and what it means for your ability to recover compensation. We will also offer insights based on our experience as an Indianapolis car wreck law firm.
Indiana uses a legal principle known as “modified comparative fault.” Under this rule, each party involved in an accident can be assigned a percentage of fault. The critical point to understand is that you can only recover compensation if you are less than 51 percent at fault. If you are found to be 51 percent or more at fault, you cannot recover damages from the other driver or their insurance company.
For example, if you are found to be 30 percent at fault for a crash and your total damages are $100,000, you would be eligible to recover $70,000. The remaining $30,000 would be deducted based on your share of fault.
There are many real-world situations where both drivers contribute to a crash. These include:
As experienced accident lawyers in Indianapolis, we analyze these complex cases to identify each party’s role and build a compelling case for our clients.
Assigning fault is not always straightforward. Insurance adjusters, attorneys, law enforcement, and in some cases, juries, all play a role in determining fault percentages. The process involves:
As an Indianapolis auto accident attorney, we often work with investigators and experts to ensure our clients’ versions of events are supported by credible evidence.
If both drivers are at fault, your compensation will be reduced in proportion to your share of the blame. This is known as a “comparative fault reduction.”
Here is how it works in practice:
Because of the high stakes involved, insurance companies often try to shift more of the blame onto you. Our role as a trusted Indianapolis auto accident attorney is to protect your rights and ensure your fault is not overstated.
When fault is disputed, insurance companies often delay or deny valid claims. They may claim you were mostly responsible or argue about the extent of your injuries. This is where legal representation becomes critical.
We strongly recommend the following steps:
As an Indianapolis car wreck law firm, we deal with these tactics every day. Our job is to stand between you and the insurance company to fight for fair compensation.
Yes. Indiana law allows you to file a personal injury lawsuit even if you share some blame, as long as you are not more than 50 percent responsible. Many successful lawsuits involve shared fault. A judge or jury will assess each party’s contribution to the accident and reduce your award accordingly.
We encourage clients not to assume they have no case just because they may have made a mistake. Let us evaluate your situation before you accept any fault or settlement.
Comparative fault cases require meticulous legal work. Your lawyer must gather evidence, manage expert witnesses, challenge the insurance company’s narrative, and present your case effectively. Without a clear and compelling argument, you may receive less than you deserve or be denied compensation entirely.
At our Indianapolis car wreck law firm, we take the following steps to protect clients in shared fault situations:
Our goal is always to minimize your assigned fault and maximize your recovery.
If you are involved in an accident and suspect both parties may be partially responsible, take the following steps:
Every step you take in the hours and days after the crash can influence the final fault determination and outcome of your case.
Yes. Indiana law allows recovery if you were less than 51 percent at fault. Your compensation will be reduced based on your percentage of fault.
Insurance companies often try to shift the blame. We advise not speaking to them directly without legal counsel. As Indianapolis auto accident attorneys, we handle these disputes and build a strong case on your behalf.
No. While police reports are important, they are not the final word. Lawyers, insurance companies, and courts may evaluate additional evidence and expert opinions.
You may still recover substantial damages depending on your share of fault. We have handled many serious injury cases where clients shared responsibility but still obtained meaningful compensation.
Yes. Many comparative fault claims are resolved through settlement. We negotiate with insurers to ensure our clients are not unfairly penalized or undercompensated.
If you have been involved in a car crash where fault is unclear or shared, do not assume you are ineligible for compensation. Indiana’s comparative fault laws are complex, and insurance companies often use that to their advantage. You need a dedicated legal team to advocate for your rights.
At our Indianapolis car wreck law firm, we are committed to helping injury victims understand their options and recover the compensation they deserve—even in difficult cases involving shared blame. If you have questions, reach out today for a free consultation. Let us evaluate your case and help you take the next step toward justice.
Copyright © 2025 Vaughn A. Wamsley. All rights reserved.